LABOR LAWS CASES CAN BE FUN FOR ANYONE

labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone

labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone

Blog Article

five.  Realized Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation from the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping tablets on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has long been made before the Court wherein the sleeping capsules were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected inside the liver although not in the stomach. For this reason, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel to the complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of a motorcycle.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may well interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it proper into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court from the United States is obtainable to the court’s website.

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice can be a mandatory need as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.

The issue here is that an accused may well say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they didn't intend to eliminate them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.

This system, for use by members with the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.

2. I have heard the uncovered counsel to the parties and also acquired DPG at length, perused the record and noticed that:-

                                                                  

To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the most significant tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there get more info to complete, i.e. safe its citizens.

In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

14. Within the light from the position explained above, it is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the size of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more

Report this page